No ideas, nor real predictions, neither a real actions in the real World.
The actions in the ME against so call IS was made to promoted a power in the arms whose step in the more information production of a success than it has real potential at the field.
The Ally in the war against self dolls whose had been created to dismantled government of Syrian Leader Bashar Al Assad who stay at the path of oil "independence" of some part of the West nations, mostly this whose have much power at the some organisation whose created in the past to promote something different what we have to see at the plan in which created and in several years before from today made and incorporate the so called leaders of the democratic World.
But in the actions whose we had to saw at Iraq and Syria we haven't see that they have a permission to take have action in the independent states?!
Is possible to make have an war actions against somebody if country whose have this aggressors at the territory fight them with an state troops?
Have in the international law a positive order that it has possible?
No, nor in the UN Charters, where is ordered that only government of a country have right to call in a help or to give a permission for an action against aggressive traitor at a self territory.
Because that actions whose impose the so call Ally has only an illegal motive to over actions against these terrorist group take control over all part of an country.
After all, in this actions stay asks which have to who pay the damages whose it make have so call liberators?
Is possible that Syria ask over UN to US and Ally to pay a price for everything what they did in the several years, from the time when they created and start to trained ISIS forces to time when they created the action against them, in all time still promote the idea how is no possible to talk with Syrian government?
If we had information from the 1999. and attacks against Yugoslavia, and where had any success in bombing the troops at the ground, even NATO had supported at the ground by the local Albanian rebel forces, to situation in Libya where action against Libyan army made any support to rebel forces, but where only action in the corrupt high officers of the local army made gains at the front. We have right to tell how is action against IS this days from the air have not to much success, not because they have sophisticate antiaircraft, but because the fears in the pilots and politicians that the loss in the air, going to make path for disaster.
If planes and ships fired bombs and rockets at the positions whose marked from the technicians at the field, it has not so correct to say that it has naff for success, because the arms lunched so far from the target and on the positions whose IS mostly abandon nearest the actions to start.
After this stupidity, the Ally and some NATO member states for not to much long period going to start talks and demands from others to resumes a more support in all.
The actions in the ME against so call IS was made to promoted a power in the arms whose step in the more information production of a success than it has real potential at the field.
The Ally in the war against self dolls whose had been created to dismantled government of Syrian Leader Bashar Al Assad who stay at the path of oil "independence" of some part of the West nations, mostly this whose have much power at the some organisation whose created in the past to promote something different what we have to see at the plan in which created and in several years before from today made and incorporate the so called leaders of the democratic World.
But in the actions whose we had to saw at Iraq and Syria we haven't see that they have a permission to take have action in the independent states?!
Is possible to make have an war actions against somebody if country whose have this aggressors at the territory fight them with an state troops?
Have in the international law a positive order that it has possible?
No, nor in the UN Charters, where is ordered that only government of a country have right to call in a help or to give a permission for an action against aggressive traitor at a self territory.
Because that actions whose impose the so call Ally has only an illegal motive to over actions against these terrorist group take control over all part of an country.
After all, in this actions stay asks which have to who pay the damages whose it make have so call liberators?
Is possible that Syria ask over UN to US and Ally to pay a price for everything what they did in the several years, from the time when they created and start to trained ISIS forces to time when they created the action against them, in all time still promote the idea how is no possible to talk with Syrian government?
If we had information from the 1999. and attacks against Yugoslavia, and where had any success in bombing the troops at the ground, even NATO had supported at the ground by the local Albanian rebel forces, to situation in Libya where action against Libyan army made any support to rebel forces, but where only action in the corrupt high officers of the local army made gains at the front. We have right to tell how is action against IS this days from the air have not to much success, not because they have sophisticate antiaircraft, but because the fears in the pilots and politicians that the loss in the air, going to make path for disaster.
If planes and ships fired bombs and rockets at the positions whose marked from the technicians at the field, it has not so correct to say that it has naff for success, because the arms lunched so far from the target and on the positions whose IS mostly abandon nearest the actions to start.
After this stupidity, the Ally and some NATO member states for not to much long period going to start talks and demands from others to resumes a more support in all.
No comments:
Post a Comment