After all, what we had to saw after first round of french election? Is it same like we had saw in the near past, in election fight between Sarcosy and Oland? Have it some directions with situation from two decades before?
In which direction would going to go situation after second turn? Does any prediction is reason to say how some candidate is bad to be elect to the post of chief in the Champ-Elise avenue?
In same condition like it had been in Wiemar Republic, modern fifth republic stay at the brink of sword. On the route to a future we have see only clouds, and nothing make us courage to say some positive about two candidate in the presidential race in French elections.
So call winner of the first turn has not charisma to be "Deus et mcshina" prepared to join France in the shine future. Of course he was made some economical move in current French government, but on the other way his reforms do not to much for common French people to see and live better then it was previous.
Neo-liberal economic policy has no chance in fool state economy build business, French economy.
No one have real intention to say how it will change anything in the work market,or in agriculture, where is main problem in deep on agriculture depend economy like France have, is.
Mr. Macron, the sentence here is about him, cannot say nothing new, what most of France did not saw and hear. A relation against Berlin and the Union stay in the main corner of a future presidential gain.
The people wants something new. And Mr Macron must has answer:what is it? Has it he, and the adviser of him,too?
We mean that it is not possible to say. He and specially the adviser rolling in the panic. The messages what came from them stay in dubious most voters.
What is real presidential candidate Macron? Liberal and neo-liberal capitalist apologetic leader or somebody who has not to say to much, but to be there because some from aside want it!?
On other way, next candidate is female and in most theme, right wing populist, whose has not to much support from aside. But she is something what regular press call in rare name for popular politician women.
Is it correct to going to claim this candidate with the such bizarre and such roughly names and comparison. She is woman, and from liberal press is expect to speak about her in the glows.
Yes, she came from the far right, but she is not less illegitimate, for it. But deeply opposite. The Mrs. Lepen coming in the political ring on the negative waves from the social structure, and liberal fails to made some gains in the economy. Where the political and elite structure stay over and look at France like on the other planet, out of touch with reality.
And when she stay in the public and chant it to plebs, most so call positive public stay to be nervous.
At her public proclamation we have to see more and more people, different social class and groups. She has talk about problems, but even she talk and make message about it, she has not knowledge how is possible to solve it!?
The yelling at the public over a meetings in the campaign in different theme it is not reason to say how she has some plane to do something after election victory. If plan stay only in relations against relations in foreigner policy it is so bad.
If she mean that is all problem going to be solve, in changes of immigration rules, she make a dance with the devil.
Even she has some deep in the advice of her's advisers, it must be publish immediately. Economy is not only few problems, but structural problem, where one era of capitalism must be moved out, and other must coming to solve deepest crisis in the French history. It mean that she cannot be family with rhetoric and political past.
For both the place of French President is hard work place, whose calling to be success at the general De Gaulle path of independent policy and inside social sensibility, where no place for big differences at the work place, nor to public, neither in racial theme.
For both of them, they must learn so hard the history of colonialism, what is the real key for French reconstruction. They must have to build new policy against former colonies and third world.
In relations against ally, they must say in public how is real situation at the Union east, and what is necessary to be change if the Union have real chance to has future. The critics against the Union, is not automatically heresy. If we have look at EU like democratic body, them no one critic isn't prohibited.
Opposite, we have devolution of the splendid idea. Idea whose know generating the war against several big partners at the Planet, and pushing EU in the lager, besieged by angry population and destroyed states from Libya to Syria.
The mounting arms and fences, what know is predominate in the presidential candidates speeches is only path in the fascism, like it had been in Wiemar Republic.
In which direction would going to go situation after second turn? Does any prediction is reason to say how some candidate is bad to be elect to the post of chief in the Champ-Elise avenue?
In same condition like it had been in Wiemar Republic, modern fifth republic stay at the brink of sword. On the route to a future we have see only clouds, and nothing make us courage to say some positive about two candidate in the presidential race in French elections.
So call winner of the first turn has not charisma to be "Deus et mcshina" prepared to join France in the shine future. Of course he was made some economical move in current French government, but on the other way his reforms do not to much for common French people to see and live better then it was previous.
Neo-liberal economic policy has no chance in fool state economy build business, French economy.
No one have real intention to say how it will change anything in the work market,or in agriculture, where is main problem in deep on agriculture depend economy like France have, is.
Mr. Macron, the sentence here is about him, cannot say nothing new, what most of France did not saw and hear. A relation against Berlin and the Union stay in the main corner of a future presidential gain.
The people wants something new. And Mr Macron must has answer:what is it? Has it he, and the adviser of him,too?
We mean that it is not possible to say. He and specially the adviser rolling in the panic. The messages what came from them stay in dubious most voters.
What is real presidential candidate Macron? Liberal and neo-liberal capitalist apologetic leader or somebody who has not to say to much, but to be there because some from aside want it!?
On other way, next candidate is female and in most theme, right wing populist, whose has not to much support from aside. But she is something what regular press call in rare name for popular politician women.
Is it correct to going to claim this candidate with the such bizarre and such roughly names and comparison. She is woman, and from liberal press is expect to speak about her in the glows.
Yes, she came from the far right, but she is not less illegitimate, for it. But deeply opposite. The Mrs. Lepen coming in the political ring on the negative waves from the social structure, and liberal fails to made some gains in the economy. Where the political and elite structure stay over and look at France like on the other planet, out of touch with reality.
And when she stay in the public and chant it to plebs, most so call positive public stay to be nervous.
At her public proclamation we have to see more and more people, different social class and groups. She has talk about problems, but even she talk and make message about it, she has not knowledge how is possible to solve it!?
The yelling at the public over a meetings in the campaign in different theme it is not reason to say how she has some plane to do something after election victory. If plan stay only in relations against relations in foreigner policy it is so bad.
If she mean that is all problem going to be solve, in changes of immigration rules, she make a dance with the devil.
Even she has some deep in the advice of her's advisers, it must be publish immediately. Economy is not only few problems, but structural problem, where one era of capitalism must be moved out, and other must coming to solve deepest crisis in the French history. It mean that she cannot be family with rhetoric and political past.
For both the place of French President is hard work place, whose calling to be success at the general De Gaulle path of independent policy and inside social sensibility, where no place for big differences at the work place, nor to public, neither in racial theme.
For both of them, they must learn so hard the history of colonialism, what is the real key for French reconstruction. They must have to build new policy against former colonies and third world.
In relations against ally, they must say in public how is real situation at the Union east, and what is necessary to be change if the Union have real chance to has future. The critics against the Union, is not automatically heresy. If we have look at EU like democratic body, them no one critic isn't prohibited.
Opposite, we have devolution of the splendid idea. Idea whose know generating the war against several big partners at the Planet, and pushing EU in the lager, besieged by angry population and destroyed states from Libya to Syria.
The mounting arms and fences, what know is predominate in the presidential candidates speeches is only path in the fascism, like it had been in Wiemar Republic.
